Connector polishing – What makes the distinction between UPC or APC.
Firstly we have to understand what the term connector polishing means. In fiber optics, the term polishing refers to the manufacturing step that shapes and smooths the connector’s ferrule endface also know as the tiny ceramic tip that holds the fiber.
There are two main goals, firstly to set the geometry ( e.g flat vs angled, radius of curvature, apex offset, fiber height) and secondly to achieve a very fine surface finish (low micro-roughness).
These two things drive the two link metrics everyone cares about, which are:
- •Insertion loss : this metric defines how much signal you lose passing through a mated pair.
- •Return loss (aka reflectance): where as this metric defines how much light bounces straight back toward the source.
Polishing is a feature of the connector on the cable or pigtail, not on the transceivers themselves. The transceivers simply present a receptacle designed to mate with a specific connector type, APC or UPC, or the lesser used PC.
PC, UPC, APC – what are the differences ?
All of the above mentioned are based on “physical contact”, meaning the fiber tips are designed to touch (with a thin moisture/oil film) rather than float across an air gap.
- •PC (Physical Contact): The legacy 0° spherical endface. It was a big step up from flat connectors, but today it’s mostly superseded by UPC.
- •UPC (Ultra Physical Contact): Still a 0° endface, but with tighter geometry control and a much finer polish. Result: lower reflectance than PC.
- •APC (Angled Physical Contact): The endface is polished at ~8°. That angle redirects any back-reflection into the fiber cladding instead of back into the laser, yielding the lowest reflectance of the three.
| Feature | PC | UPC | APC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endface angle | 0° | 0° (tighter geometry, smoother finish) | ~8° |
| Typical return loss (higher is better) | ≥ ~40 dB | ≥ ~50–55 dB | ≥ ~60–65 dB (or better) |
| Common use | Older installs | Ethernet, DWDM, most SM links | PON/FTTx, CATV/RFoG, analog/phase-sensitive links |
Insertion loss can be excellent for both UPC and APC with quality parts and clean endfaces. The standout difference is reflectance.
So what exactly has Polishing?
Like mentioned previously transceivers don’t really have polishing they just specify what type of cables they expect, e.g : if a transceiver has a LC or SC connector almost in all and every single scenario it will be expecting an UPC polished cable.
- •Most Ethernet optics expect LC/UPC.
- •GPON/XGS-PON, CATV/RFoG, and many FTTx OLT/ONT ports expect SC/APC.
- •MPO/MTP-based optics come in MPO-UPC and MPO-APC variants—match what the module and patch panel specify.
Where as cables, patch cords and pigtails will have the polished ferrule e.g : LC-UPC, SC-UPC, MPO-APC.
Compatibility
It it also imperative to make the distinction between the correct polishing types before connecting cables together, since using the wrong cables can still damage the endfaces and negatively impact your link configuration.
- •Do not mate APC to UPC directly. Even if the connectors “click” together (e.g., SC form factor), the geometry is wrong, reflectance skyrockets, and you can damage the endfaces.
- •For LC/SC Use the color cue: Blue (UPC) mates with blue; Green (APC) mates with green.
- •For MPOs’ it gets more tricky, as the color cue method isn’t reliable. Try to find the parts’ label and look for : “MPO/UPC” or “MPO/APC”.
- •If your plant requires crossing polish types at a boundary, use purpose-built hybrid jumpers or modules labeled for UPC↔APC—not ad-hoc mating.
When should you chose APC or UPC?
To keep it simple, choose APC when:
- •The application is sensitive to back-reflection (PON/FTTx, CATV/RFoG, some analog or phase-critical systems).
- •The path includes many connectors/splitters where cumulative reflections add up.
- •The equipment explicitly calls for APC.
And choose UPC when:
- •You’re building typical digital Ethernet links (1G/10G/25G/100G/400G) where optics expect LC/UPC.
- •The link budget/spec names UPC or doesn’t demand APC-grade reflectance.
- •You’re working with multimode—APC is essentially not used in MM; UPC/PC dominate.
Summary
To convey it simply polishing is the step that refers to how in manufacturing the connectors ferrule endface is shaped and/or smoothened. UPC and APC are both physical-contact finishes. UPC keeps a 0° spherical endface with a very fine polish and typically delivers return loss of ≥50–55 dB. APC introduces an ~8° angle so any back-reflection is steered into the cladding rather than the laser, typically achieving ≥60–65 dB. But polishing has nothing to do with the transceivers, yes transceivers have certain connectors which are expecting certain polished finishes on the connectors but the term polishing refers to the cables’ connector not the transceiver, modules simply specify what they expect. If it is hard to determine which is which use color cues which help determine (blue for UPC, green for APC), but if a transition is unavoidable use purpose built hybrid jumpers for it. Also remember, never mate APC to UPC even if they “fit”.