A deep-dive into 400G Coherent Optics Guide: ZR, ZR+ and beyond.

When 400G was introduced the question was – how can we get it to 80km, taking into account the dispersion compensation and optical power. Answer was, we couldn’t. But when coherent technology was introduced inside of the 400G transceivers allowing the circuitry’s digital signal processors to correct the dispersion compensation, the signal was able to travel a lot further than the initial 40km. Previously using coherent technology was a hassle, considering you had to have all of the extra gear with the CFP form factor optics, now with the new routers which have 400G QSFP DD slots where you can plug the transceivers in directly, in the process eliminating all of the optical transport gear. Meaning this was more cost effective and much more simpler for coherent technology.

Before we dive into a more technical analysis of 400G Coherent and its many versions we first need to understand 400G Coherent both inside and out. So, what are they ? 400G Coherent optics are compact and power efficient optics that are redefining how operators architect everything from short-reach data center interconnect to long-haul links. As the demand for high-capacity, flexible and scalable transport surges, coherent optics have become a cornerstone technology in modern infrastructure. Among these is the advent of pluggable coherent modules such as 400G ZR, ZR+ and emerging multi-haul (MZR) variants. This guide explores the evolving landscape of 400G coherent optics, comparing ZR standards, vendor specific and performance optimized modules, while also offering some insight to their deployment, considerations, power consumption and interoperability.

1. Differences between ZR‑S, ZR+ HP, MZR HP, and MZR P variants

First off, lets start by comparing the differences between all the variants of 400G coherent optics.

Starting with the most known 400G-QDD-DCO-ZR:

  • This is the baseline OIF 400ZR standard for 400 Gbps coherent pluggables. It relies on dual-polarization 16QAM with conventional CFEC, reaching up to ~40 km over unamplified G.652 fiber and around 120km over amplified. It’s fully open-standard, enabling multi-vendor interoperability and is physically packaged in QSFP‑DD or OSFP modules compatible with standard switch/router ports

 

Also worth mentioning the 400G-QDD-DCO-ZRP variant which is an extended reach version for the Coherent ZR:

  • ZR+ or ZRP is a vendor-led extension designed to push beyond the ZR reach. It adds improved FEC (often oFEC), higher launch power, and sometimes QPSK or 8QAM options. ZR+ can achieve ~450 km point-to-point reach under optimal conditions and up to ~600 km at lower rates (e.g., 300G)

 

Continuing on with HP variants for the ZR options we have 400G-QDD-DCO-ZRHP (ZR High Power):

  • HP versions of ZR+ modules increase transmitter power up to +4dBm in our case, improving OSNR budget. The extra signal margin allows longer spans or operation over marginal fiber with fewer amplifiers. HP variants consume more power ~20W and must match on both ends for performance.

 

And lastly we have the 400G-QDD-DCO-MZRP and 400G-QDD-DCO-MZRHP variants for 400G:

  • MZR (Multi‑Haul ZR) optics are software-tunable ZR+ HP modules capable of adapting modulation format and data rate (from 100 G to 400 G) based on fiber conditions. The HP or P variants emphasize high OSNR launches. In practice, depending on the module these can reach ~50km unamplified or ~75km unamplified at 400G and can scale up to ~2000 km at lower rates, offering unmatched flexibility.

 

And here’s a chart for an easier and more understandable overview of the differences between these variants.

Variant Reach FEC Power Key Features
400G-QDD-DCO-ZR ~40 km (unamplified) / ~120 km (amplified) CFEC Max ~18W Interoperable, standard QSFP-DD/OSFP form factor
400G-QDD-DCO-ZRP ~450 km (400G) / ~600 km (300G) oFEC Max ~21W Extended reach, higher launch power, not fully interoperable
400G-QDD-DCO-ZRHP Longer spans over marginal fiber oFEC Max ~20W +4 dBm Tx power, better OSNR, must be used in matched pairs
400G-QDD-DCO-MZRP ~50–75 km (400G unamplified), up to ~2000 km (lower G) Advanced FEC 100G ~16W 200G ~22W 300G ~23W 400G ~23W Software-tunable rates and formats, flexible deployment, adaptive modulation
400G-QDD-DCO-MZRHP Same as MZRP, but with higher launch power Advanced FEC ZR100 ~18W ZR200 ~22W ZR300 ~22W ZR400 ~22W Adds high-power launch to MZRP for better OSNR and longer spans

2. Interoperability considerations

With all that being said we of course cant forget that we have to take into consideration the interoperability considerations for all of these variants.

When deploying 400G coherent optics, interoperability is a key concern—especially in multi-vendor environments. Not all module types are designed for plug-and-play compatibility, and differences in modulation, FEC, and optical power can limit mix-and-match flexibility.

The most interoperable is the 400G-QDD-DCO-ZR, which follows the OIF 400ZR open standard. It uses fixed DP-16QAM modulation and CFEC, ensuring reliable operation across different vendors’ modules—ideal for DCI and metro links up to ~120 km.

The ZR+ (ZRP) and ZRHP variants extend reach (up to ~600 km) using stronger FEC (like oFEC), alternative modulations (QPSK/8QAM), and higher launch power. However, these are vendor-specific extensions with no formal standard, so interoperability is limited or absent unless using matched pairs from the same ecosystem.

High Power ZR+ (ZRHP) modules push optical power further to support longer or lower-quality spans. These must be paired with matching high-power modules, further reducing interoperability.

Finally, MZR and MZRHP variants offer the most flexibility with tunable modulation and rates for reaches up to 2000 km at lower data rates. But this flexibility comes at the cost of strict vendor matching, making interoperability across platforms nearly impossible without extensive coordination.

To put this all very bluntly:

  • 400ZR = high interoperability
  • ZR+, ZRHP, MZR = high performance, low interoperability Operators must balance reach and flexibility against compatibility requirements in multi-vendor networks.

3. Power consumption considerations

Thermal management requirements

  • 20+ W coherent optics stress cooling and airflow. Many switch platforms disable ports or limit port count to maintain thermal budgets. For instance, certain Juniper QFX models only enable ~16 of 32 QSFP‑DD‑ZR ports simultaneously on “High Power Mode”. Fan speeds and chassis ventilation must be calibrated accordingly.

 

Power supply for high-density deployments

  • A rack with 32 ZR+ HP modules can draw ~0.8 kW for optics alone. At scale, this requires robust power planning, balanced redundancy, and heat cooling (e.g., 2+ power supplies, additional fan trays).

 

Trade-offs: reach vs. power

  • Higher power enables more reach but increases thermal burden. ZR reaches ~120 km at 15 W; ZR+ HP adds reach at ~20 W. MZR modules may consume ~22-23 W to support 480 km full‑rate capability—a necessary trade-off for longer links.

4. Distance capabilities and applications

One of the key strengths of 400G coherent optics—particularly the ZR, ZR+, and MZR families is their versatility across a wide range of transport distances and deployment environments.

Depending on the modulation scheme, optical signal integrity, and link design, these modules can deliver high-capacity connections ranging from short-haul 40 km point-to-point data center interconnects to regional 480 km links, and even beyond 1,000 km when amplification and forward error correction are optimized.

A visual representation for the 400G optics and their distances:

Variant Reach
400G-QDD-DCO-ZR ~40 km (unamplified) / ~120 km (amplified)
400G-QDD-DCO-ZRP ~450 km (400G) / ~600 km (300G)
400G-QDD-DCO-ZRHP Longer spans over marginal fiber
400G-QDD-DCO-MZRP ~50–75 km (400G unamplified), up to ~2000 km (lower G)
400G-QDD-DCO-MZRHP Same as MZRP, but with higher launch power

5. FlexTune™, remote provisioning & flex-grid

FlexTune™ feature

Automatically scans C‑band channel slots to lock transceivers to the correct wavelength based on physical mux/demux connection – no manual tuning needed. Coherent’s white paper shows self‑tuning in <2 min, reducing provisioning time from hours to mere minutes.

Remote provisioning, Flex-grid support and Integration with planning tools

Standards like CMIS and C‑CMIS enable remote orchestration of channel, power, modulation, and line rate—allowing thousands of links to be configured centrally without field access.

Modules support 50/75/100 GHz spacing, enabling alignment with elastic ROADMs and maximizing spectral efficiency.

Optical network planning systems ingest module parameters (reach, OSNR, modulation flexibility) to model fiber networks, enabling click‑to‑deploy services.

Operational benefits:

  • Pluggable optics reduce capital costs and simplify inventory.
  • Rapid provisioning enhances TTM.
  • Ability to remotely adapt services fosters on-demand scalability.
  • Fewer regenerations and amplifiers mean lower OPEX.

6. Conclusions and selection criteria for use cases

Selecting the appropriate 400G coherent optic ultimately depends on matching the module’s capabilities to the network’s specific demands in terms of reach, spectral efficiency, power, and operational flexibility. With the growing diversity of ZR, ZR+, and MZR variants, there’s no one-size-fits-all—each option is optimized for a different application scenario.

For short metro deployments, the standard ZR (ZR-S) modules offer the best blend of cost, simplicity, and multi-vendor interoperability, making them ideal for dense data center interconnects or edge aggregation up to ~120 km.

As networks extend beyond the metro, ZR+ and MZR modules bring the reach and performance needed for regional links, with ZR+ delivering enhanced FEC and power margins, and MZR offering tunable rates and modulation to dynamically adapt to fiber conditions. In cases where fiber is older, impaired, or spans are unusually long, high-power variants like ZR+ HP or MZR HP can maintain signal integrity by increasing launch power and OSNR, though they demand more thermal and power resources.

For operators focused on spectral efficiency, coherent 400G with 16QAM is ideal. However, if extending reach is a higher priority, stepping down to 100G or 200G with QPSK on MZR modules provides excellent distance gains while still maintaining solid throughput—thanks to the flexibility of adaptive modulation.

Power and thermal considerations play a critical role in high-density environments. QSFP-DD platforms, while compact, must account for the fact that ZR+ HP modules consume up to 50% more power than baseline ZR units. Proper chassis design, airflow, and power redundancy become crucial for reliable operation at scale.

Finally, interoperability should not be overlooked. Standard ZR modules offer seamless cross-vendor support. In contrast, ZR+, ZRHP, and MZR variants often require matched endpoints or fallback to common configurations (like OpenZR+ MSA), especially in multi-vendor networks. This highlights the need for thoughtful vendor selection and long-term strategy alignment. Looking ahead, MZR’s software-defined tunability offers a future-proof option for dynamic network scaling.

Operators can deploy 100G or 200G links today and seamlessly upgrade to full 400G performance later—without replacing hardware, dramatically simplifying migrations and preserving investment.

In short, successful deployment of 400G coherent optics means understanding your network’s physical realities, performance requirements, and future plans—and matching those to the right coherent solution from this evolving ecosystem.

FAQ

What's the difference between 400G ZR and ZR+ modules, and which should I choose?

Mostly you can divide the differences in 3 terms: reach, interoperability and power consumption
  • 400G ZR uses OIF open standard, reach is about 40km unamplified or around 120km when amplified, uses ~18W power, and is easily tweaked for required compatibility.
  • 400G ZR+ (ZRP) is a vendor-specific extension that can reach around ~450km at 400G or dropping to ~600km at 300G, uses ~21W power, has very difficult compatibility tweaking
Choose ZR if you need standard connection for distances of up to 120km and want to have the highest interoperability with most device vendors. Choose ZR+ if you need reach beyond 120km and can utilize a single vendor equipment across the connection.

How much power and cooling capacity do I need for 400G coherent optics deployment?

Across the wide range of the modules and their reach, the power consumption as well changes significantly:
  • Standard ZR modules: ~15-18W each
  • ZR+ and HP variants: ~20-23W each
  • A full rack with 32 ZR+ HP modules can draw ~0.8kW just for optics
Critical considerations:
  • Many switches limit active ports, bottleneck is caused by the cooling performance per-port for a specific device you may be using
  • Usage of full rack solutions will require a substantial investment into the cooling of the stack
  • Have a failsafe redundancy power supply units for seamless module performance

Can I mix different vendors' 400G coherent modules in my network?

It depends entirely on the module type:
  • Standard 400G ZR – YES: wide interoperability potential.
  • ZR+, ZRHP, MZR variants – NO: limited, vendor-specific interoperability.